"closed/disabled" this account that was "closed" last year. Irina Torina
was told her account was closed because she moved and her Rogers account
was closed because of the move summer last year. She had linked her
Yahoo.ca email to her Rogers internet service.
I still say Yahoo! email service is notoriously insecure, especially
since they partnered with Microsoft last year. Because of this
partnership Yahoo! has abandoned their Linux distribution, which is
secure, in favour Microsoft's insecure technologies. Way to go Yahoo!
Build a insecure network and the Russian Mafia will come and use your
service to open accounts with Google for phishing, spamming and identify
theft attacks. Is this the only was Yahoo! and Microsoft can hope to
compete with Google?
Yahoo! Mail wrote:
> Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
> In this particular case, we have taken appropriate action against the
> Yahoo! account in question, as per our Terms of Service (TOS). For
> further details about the Yahoo! TOS, you can visit:
> Please know that Yahoo! is unable to disclose the action taken on
> another user's account with a third party. We are not able to make
> exceptions to this rule.
> In addition, please visit the URL below for useful tools to combat spam:
> Please let me know if you still need assistance so I may assist you
> Your patience during this process is greatly appreciated.
> Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Mail.
> Yahoo! Customer Care
> For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
> Original Message Follows:
> This email account was closed last. Why is Yahoo! allowing the Russian
> Mafia to continue to use it? Is it to facilitate them to use Google's
> services to illegally sell prescription drugs and carry out phishing
> attacks? It is time Google and Gmail block all mail originating from the
> Yahoo! network.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Delivered-To: spy.c.xamaican
> Received: by 10.216.183.16 with SMTP id p16cs155714wem; Tue, 22 Jun
> 2010 10:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.100.244.38 with SMTP id
> r38mr5530074anh.29.1277227784465; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from (mail.mud.yahoo.com)
> [126.96.36.199]) by google.com with SMTP id
> 9si3425446ywh.76.2010.06.22.10.29.42; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:43 -0700
> Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 188.8.131.52 is neither permitted
> nor denied by best guess record for domain of firstname.lastname@example.org)
> Authentication-Results: google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
> 184.108.40.206 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
> domain of email@example.com) firstname.lastname@example.org;
> dkim=pass (test mode) email@example.com
> Received: (qmail 5706 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jun 2010 17:29:42 -0000
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca;
> s=s1024; t=1277227782; bh=h7qxVPHksmMWd2yd9IuYPG2ri/bGLvpEBdowNVDOzAg=;
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca;
> Message-ID: <****.firstname.lastname@example.org>
> X-YMail-OSG: C7_9lcQVM1kBPlBNmRZbxBPzT3KwOmLjcyeUFmaO91Y.is8
> Received: from [220.127.116.11] by *****.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:42 PDT
> X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.1.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
> From: email@example.com
> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: ppaliy@*****.com<, spy.c.xamaican@*****.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > http://sites.google.com/site/ITEa3fghClpF/WUbSrOhq > >
All the link on http://sites.google.com/site/ITEa3fghClpF/WUbSrOhq , which is referenced in the original spam message that started this dialogue with Yahoo!, leads to IP 18.104.22.168 which is based in China.
The Whois record for that IP address is:
inetnum: 22.214.171.124 - 126.96.36.199
descr: China Unicom Jilin province network
descr: China Unicom
changed: *****@apnic.net 20031212
status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE
changed: *****@apnic.net 20040301
changed: *****@apnic.net 20060124
changed: *****@apnic.net 20090508
descr: CNC Group CHINA169 Jilin Province Network
changed: *****@cnc-noc.net 20060118
person: ChinaUnicom Hostmaster
address: No.21,Jin-Rong Street
changed: *****@chinaunicom.cn 20090408
person: Wang Tiegang
address: NO.3535,Renmin Street, ChangChun ,
address: Jilin province , 130021 , P.R. China
changed: *****@mail.jl.cn 20060626
Does Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the rest of the world need any more proof that the Russian Mafia and the Chinese are working together to gain control of western businesses and governments?
Why is Yahoo! and Microsoft helping the Russian Mafia and Chinese use Google to attack western businesses and governments?